Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '17 at 06:14
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 577
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 200
Parallax 175
149% 186 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 173
Splatting 137
119% 146 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 131%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Areca ARC-1882-VOL#000 28TB
13.5TB free
Firmware: R001 Max speed: UDMA 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Areca ARC-1882-VOL#001 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: R001 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Intel Raid 0 Volume 487GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 987
Write 445
Mixed 542
144% 658 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 27.3
131% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 22
88% 199 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 118%
Great: 214%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB
752GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 99.4
Mixed 86.9
73% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
749GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 92.3
Mixed 81.2
69% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.28
102% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
499GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 87.3
Mixed 87.2
66% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.25
81% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 83%
Seagate BUP Fast HDD 4TB
2TB free, PID ab2a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 269
Mixed 156
262% 192 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 8.46
4K Mixed 0.74
315% 3.24 MB/s
DQ Read 0.64
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 0.49
446% 4.56 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
507GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 109
Write 124
Mixed 115
152% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.27
72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 35.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,163
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback