Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 27.1 1-Core 18.7 2-Core 55.5 20% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 85.3 8-Core 99.1 12% 92.2 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
oyunkey 512GB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 64 60 41 36 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 312 Write 268 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 83.4 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.2 1% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 98%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 4.7 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 5.2 Mixed 9 SusWrite 4.7 11% 9.25 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5.5 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 272 15% 272 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	3x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	2x
Radeon HD 8400 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 65 samples	1x
Radeon HD 8330 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 49 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	1x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16