Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 20:50
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 107 2-Core 218 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 392 54% 401 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	62.5% Good	Lighting 93 Reflection 89.7 Parallax 90.1 76% 90.9 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 51 Splatting 0.09 37% 52 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 16 16 14 21 19 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.2% Poor	Read 168 Write 32.7 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 20.2 12% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 0.1 49% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 63.6 DQ Mixed 0.2 26% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 78%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 262GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 169 167 165 167 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 161 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 166 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 207GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 175 178 177 179 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 132 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 172 85% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.9 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 37 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 4.3 12% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.9 148% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 24GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 9.4 8.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 36 Write 21.2 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 9.9 26% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.1 147% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 1x8GB 4,811 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.3% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9.8 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.1 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	544x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	225x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	134x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	116x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	57x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	97x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16