MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 94
2-Core 171
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 461
45% 372 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 58.3
Parallax 88.6
53% 70.6 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 76.1
54% 64.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 221 247 249 255 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 287
Write 359
Mixed 295
SusWrite 245
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 30.9
106% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 44
36% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 124%
MDT MD2500AAJS-00B4A0 250GB
155GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 62 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 69.2
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 62.5
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70% Good
Read 134
Write 98.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 110
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-GD65 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback