HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory2.8 GB free of 4.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '17 at 21:17
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 132
61% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 395
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 6.41
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 9.71
Gravity 7.93
Splatting 8.57
7% 8.74 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VK0300GDUQV 300GB
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4IWV Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.8% Good
Read 266
Write 261
Mixed 238
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 24.5
108% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 104
98% 151 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 92%
ST950042 0AS 500GB
457GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 29
Mixed 11.9
29% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 38GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback