MSI Z270M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI Z270M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '17 at 20:28
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 96.2
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 202
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 298
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A69) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 3.59
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 9.61
6% 6.56 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 493
Write 275
Mixed 278
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 28.2
133% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 26.5
68% 149 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
464GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 106
Write 115
Mixed 104
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.26
95% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 63%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB
231GB free
Firmware: GL001U Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 56.1
Mixed 54.3
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.17
59% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 49%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
99GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 51.9
Write 53.9
Mixed 50
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.34
82% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 29.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 28.5
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI Z270M MORTAR (MS-7A69) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback