HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 861
88% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 160
Parallax 158
138% 162 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 145
Splatting 108
116% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 269 171 148 152 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 682
Write 243
Mixed 146
SusWrite 210
70% 320 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 65.5
214% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 131
160% 298 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 124%
Great: 147%
Kingdian S280 240GB
17GB free
Firmware: R1001A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 402
Mixed 397
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 29.5
140% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 43.6
102% 211 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 119%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
29GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 106 81 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 416
Write 278
Mixed 259
SusWrite 115
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 18.1
72% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 40.1
47% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 55%
Sobetter Ext 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.27% Terrible
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 68.9
18% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
324GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 172 174 176 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 174
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
832GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 164 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 162
Mixed 111
SusWrite 164
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 21.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback