Asus A55BM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A55BM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '20 at 19:06
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 101
51% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 168
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Sanyo(144D 809B) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 3.34
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCP725050GLA380 500GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4OA53A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 32 59 79 68 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 4.7
Write 18.9
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 53.2
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
26% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55BM-PLUS Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback