Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Satellite A665 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '20 at 09:03
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 61.7 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 54.3 34% 49.2 Pts	4-Core 81.9 8-Core 108 12% 95.2 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M 8,303 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD30) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 327.65 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.09 2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,378 Write 21.4 Mixed 43 100% 481 MB/s	4K Read 206 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 3.2 317% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GB 2,358 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	65x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	34x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	25x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	24x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	11x
TSB1066D3S7DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 25%, 367 samples	9x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $218

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16