HP s5558hk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP s5558hk  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '17 at 06:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 152
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 282
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galaxy GX0240ML105-G 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.3% Above average
Read 264
Write 225
Mixed 208
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 15.6
78% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 30.2
63% 126 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 76%
INTEL SS DSC2BF240A4H 240GB
205GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 20.2
Write 19.5
Mixed 19.5
25% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.42
4K Write 6.74
4K Mixed 3.3
365% 5.49 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic 240GB
109GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 22.7
Write 20.5
Mixed 20.2
27% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 7.74
4K Mixed 3.81
422% 6.42 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CB04 DDR3 1600G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical s5558hk Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP s5558hk

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback