Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 20:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 231
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 610
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 119
Parallax 108
85% 110 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 104
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 45 35 42 43 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 425
Write 63.7
Mixed 102
SusWrite 42.2
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 21
88% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 55.2
79% 156 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 108%
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
56GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 156 164 164 166 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 238
Write 165
Mixed 158
SusWrite 162
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 19.5
68% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 55.4
54% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback