| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Boot Drive | 60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Samsung 3570R/370R/470R/450R/510R (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP470R5E-X01CL |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130528 |
| Uptime | 4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 07 '17 at 00:46 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61%
Good
|
66% 108 Pts
|
27% 201 Pts
|
13% 208 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C706) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2
|
||||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial_ FCCT128MX10 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
48% 217 MB/s
|
98% 33.8 MB/s
|
75% 143 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.3%
Above average
|
57% 20 GB/s
|
47% 16.6 GB/s
|
57% 70 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 3570R/370R/470R/450R/510R Builds (Compare 33 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 3570R/370R/470R/450R/510R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 16x |
| Core i3-2365MIntelBench 41%, 2,016 samples | 6x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $100 |