Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 14:49
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 212
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 660
62% 513 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 84.8
56% 74.7 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 57.6
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1779 1982 2010 2030 2033 2033 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,471
Write 2031
Mixed 137
SusWrite 1,978
368% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 71.4
234% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 642
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 507
388% 530 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 317%
Great: 372%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
781GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 114 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 121
Write 110
Mixed 102
SusWrite 113
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
326GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 95 99 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 51
Write 7.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 84.5
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
496GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.1 7.4 11 7.9 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 86.9
Write 14.4
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 9.7
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 55%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 134 135 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 136
Mixed 110
SusWrite 133
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 27.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.7
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback