Supermicro X11SSV-Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X11SSV-Q  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SSV-Q
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 05:58
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 203
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 336
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 57.8
55% 63.8 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 66.5
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 126 83 82 83 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 463
Write 431
Mixed 351
SusWrite 134
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 35.2
146% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 201
177% 261 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-002.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X11SSV-Q Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X11SSV-Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback