HP 500-326na

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 500-326na  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory6.9 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140904
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 01:08
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 126
51% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 203
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Lighting 92
Reflection 82.5
Parallax 74.2
75% 82.9 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 76.8
72% 89.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 305
Write 363
Mixed 328
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 33.5
128% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 175
145% 207 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEF F3-12800CL8-4GBRM F3-12800CL8-4GBRM 14GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-326na Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-326na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback