Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 23:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 390
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1436 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 92.4
59% 78.1 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 60.7
55% 68.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F7 PLUS 3D NAND 240GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 393 389 392 393 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 491
Write 392
Mixed 367
SusWrite 394
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 21.9
100% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 38.6
87% 174 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PLEXHDer9.A01LF 0080 PLEXHDer 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback