Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 17:02
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 112 2-Core 216 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 677 63% 524 Pts	64-Core 896 55% 896 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Lighting 77.5 Reflection 75.9 Parallax 67.4 63% 73.6 fps	MRender 77.5 Gravity 74.9 Splatting 74.7 62% 75.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW256G8 256GB 4,898 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHF002C Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 497 Write 434 Mixed 298 91% 410 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 43.1 141% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 205 180% 270 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 113%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 135 145 166 167 167 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 154 Write 148 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 153 89% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 107%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 49GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 36.5 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 37.8 49% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FBD2 2x4GB 3,180 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 34.9 111% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 33.6 SC Mixed 27.1 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	37x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	15x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	13x

SSD
A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GBKingston $53Bench 108%, 30,265 samples	7x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $372

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16