Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 15:45
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 113
2-Core 264
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 956
88% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,317
82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1475 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 112
Parallax 107
85% 108 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 97
Splatting 90.8
76% 93.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 481 486 496 455 397 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 1,700
Mixed 1,280
SusWrite 612
269% 1,190 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 71.1
245% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 917
669% 876 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 198%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 21.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback