Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional Gaming i7  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 05:18
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 162
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 560
52% 431 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 115
Parallax 108
88% 110 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 324 156 162 139 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 478
Write 448
Mixed 356
SusWrite 228
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 35.9
128% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 193
182% 285 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 101%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 136 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 124
Mixed 111
SusWrite 136
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 2GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.6
11% 9.57 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3300 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 34
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional Gaming i7 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback