Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 05 '17 at 22:34
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 181
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 686
62% 524 Pts
64-Core 1,850
114% 1,850 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1612 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 121
Parallax 109
93% 115 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 105
Splatting 95.6
82% 101 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 496
Write 401
Mixed 407
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 18.7
89% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 18.2
20% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 134%
Mushkin ECO2 SMI 512GB-$80
68GB free
Firmware: N1007C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.4% Above average
Read 262
Write 249
Mixed 255
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 15.7
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 15.6
54% 118 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
65GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.5% Above average
Read 264
Write 207
Mixed 214
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 17.2
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 16.4
33% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
707GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 122
Mixed 120
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.21
82% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ Desk Mac 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 113
Write 157
Mixed 163
197% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.24
51% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70PH0-YK 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 36.6
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $340
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback