Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 19:09
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 833
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.7% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 102
Parallax 86.5
80% 95.3 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 91
Splatting 92.7
74% 90.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 304 302 299 300 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 363
Write 307
Mixed 280
SusWrite 301
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 39.1
155% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 241
208% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
91GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 134 134 135 135 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 321
Write 152
Mixed 206
SusWrite 135
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 35.8
141% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 105
90% 133 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
9GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 416
Write 153
Mixed 191
55% 253 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 37.7
155% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 112
96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
GB1000EAMYC 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 70.5
Write 73
Mixed 56
SusWrite 81
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 63%
WD i HDS72 External 1TB
320GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 41
Write 41.2
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 41.7
55% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback