Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VG4 (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '20 at 18:27
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G540-$70 1,658 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 125 56% 90.6 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 122 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% PNY(196E 11C7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 18.5 16% 17.7 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.3 16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: F SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 45 32 41 48 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 31.8 Write 38.5 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 40.9 28% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 14GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 16 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 17.9 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 17.1 26% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.7 136% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	70x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	50x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	27x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GBUnknownBench 63%, 31 samples	13x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $146

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16