| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190618 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 02 '20 at 15:34 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.6%
Above average
|
66% 118 Pts
|
50% 419 Pts
|
34% 554 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
69.4%
Good
|
74% 84 fps
|
60% 73.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 8.6 35 17 16 MB/s
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
6% 26.4 MB/s
|
21% 8.3 MB/s
|
57% 78.5 MB/s
|
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
114GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 3.4 1.9 2.4 4.2 7.5 MB/s
|
36% 39 MB/s
|
18% 0.3 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
31.7%
Below average
|
31% 10.7 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
31% 130 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,102 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,469x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 954x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 737x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 656x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $345 |