Acer Nitro AN515-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Freed_RRS
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 09:33
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 178
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 519
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Acer(1025 125D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 35.6
26% 32.7 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 32
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 75 158 77 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 464
Write 136
Mixed 324
SusWrite 86.4
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 27
110% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 80.7
96% 165 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
870GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 108 117 103 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 142
Write 144
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 112
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
237% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown J641GU42J7240N3 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-42 Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback