HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10
Memory124.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 08:52
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 45.9
1-Core 55
2-Core 92.7
38% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 377
36% 299 Pts
64-Core 2417
150% 2417 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 107GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 127 131 130 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 2.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 129 132 131 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
JetFlash Transcend 256GB
235GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 133 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 204
Write 132
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 134
175% 139 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HPE P03052-191 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 19.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback