HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 08:41
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 193
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 680
64% 531 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.8% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 83.2
80% 89.8 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 73.6
70% 87.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 1036 596 596 601 594 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,197
Write 1,793
Mixed 1,426
SusWrite 783
346% 1,550 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 67.1
219% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 878
662% 889 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 244%
Great: 295%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
779GB free
Firmware: Z33110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 137 148 171 183 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 287
Write 117
Mixed 356
SusWrite 152
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 17.7
90% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 0.2
55% 130 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
920GB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 159 161 169 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 171
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 153
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 179 181 181 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 142
Mixed 81
SusWrite 179
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 170 171 172 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 159
Mixed 116
SusWrite 169
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G HP26D4U9D8ME-16X KHX2666C16/16G KHX2666C16/16G 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.8% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback