Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160-$79 48,506 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 144 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 249 31% 238 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 25 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 36E8) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 358.70 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 1.81 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 53 35 61 76 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 423 Write 345 Mixed 211 SusWrite 81.9 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 20.4 89% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 73.5 61% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 15.6 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	28x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	12x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	10x
PSD38G16002 2x8GBPatriotBench 52%, 6,044 samples	8x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBMicronBench 49%, 13 samples	7x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237