| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W380 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D2917-A1 |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100818 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 05 '17 at 15:41 |
| Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.8%
Average
|
54% 91.3 Pts
|
27% 202 Pts
|
12% 202 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 838C) 1GB
CLim: 917 MHz, MLim: 925 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66
|
4.13%
Terrible
|
4% 5.62 fps
|
4% 4.85 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
39.9%
Below average
|
38% 172 MB/s
|
65% 25.7 MB/s
|
40% 71.9 MB/s
|
|
|
37.1%
Below average
|
51% 67.8 MB/s
|
86% 0.74 MB/s
| |
|
|
41.5%
Average
|
53% 70.4 MB/s
|
99% 0.97 MB/s
| |
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W380 Builds (Compare 48 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W380
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 24x |
| Core i5 660IntelBench 49%, 5,902 samples | 7x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 3x |
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $149 |