Dell Precision M4700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M4700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09YFWF
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 12:09
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 385
44% 342 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
Dell(1028 153E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8216
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.62
4% 4.38 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 5.96
5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0925A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 454 456 458 462 462 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 500
Write 454
Mixed 417
SusWrite 426
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 33.3
112% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 135
107% 153 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
159GB free
Firmware: GH2OA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69% Good
Read 118
Write 125
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 122
70% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F M471B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4700 Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback