Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 07:51
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 221
85% 144 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 698
76% 589 Pts
64-Core 692
46% 692 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$320
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 301
Parallax 343
0% 215 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 300
Splatting 198
82% 233 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 92%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 45 22 26 112 155 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 97%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 1,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $303
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback