Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N475 115 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Memory 37.8 1-Core 7.9 2-Core 12.8 16% 19.5 Pts	4-Core 12.5 8-Core 12.7 2% 12.6 Pts	64-Core 13.1 1% 13.1 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 62 61 61 62 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 58.8 Write 55.5 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 60.6 39% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 43%
SMI USB DISK 64GB 1,634 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 59GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 9.3 9.8 12 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.65% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 12.5 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 10.7 17% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.3 55% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.65% Great: 40%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 070a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 10.2 Mixed 9.9 SusWrite 3.5 12% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M4 70T5663QZ3-CF7 1x2GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.73% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 2.5 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16