Lenovo 418062F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 418062F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 418062F
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160905
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 93.3
41% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 198
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.42 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.35
2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 374 375 376 374 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 276
Mixed 307
SusWrite 374
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 28.7
116% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 265
226% 331 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 129%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 63GB
57GB free
Firmware: 01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 43 46 32 47 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-100.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback