Mousecomputer IStDXi-M1B4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMousecomputer IStDXi-M1B4  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer B450M-A
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 08:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 779
76% 622 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.1% Above average
Lighting 77.2
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 69.5
63% 72.7 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 54
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VC 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 169 273 275 277 276 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 461
Mixed 433
SusWrite 256
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 46.4
152% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 127
161% 287 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 115%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
787GB free, PID 01ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 35.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 37.2
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4U9S1ME-4 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.6% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 22.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback