Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '20 at 05:50
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 228 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 768 71% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,234 76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 182 Parallax 179 131% 174 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 155 Splatting 121 107% 131 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 276 266 253 236 331 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 1,740 Write 1,390 Mixed 576 SusWrite 323 223% 1,007 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 22.8 4K Mixed 29.5 109% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 809 DQ Write 69.4 DQ Mixed 158 186% 345 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 236%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 519GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 11 11 31 18 12 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 36 Write 58.7 Mixed 65 SusWrite 20.3 34% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 414GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 144 120 137 114 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 108 Write 109 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 130 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 104%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 50TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 3.8 9.3 5.7 4.3 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 42.8 Write 58.3 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 7.6 24% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 105%
Covecube Virtual Disk 55TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 49TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.8 9.2 6 3.9 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 67 Write 130 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 10.2 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4BL.M16FE 2x16GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 39.2 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 39.9 SC Mixed 33 93% 32.4 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	329x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	196x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)