Lenovo 2356H7S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2356H7S  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2356H7S
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 22:30
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 71
2-Core 118
56% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 145
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2200) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 11.7
3% 6.79 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.17
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 293 286 302 300 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57% Above average
Read 263
Write 284
Mixed 206
SusWrite 293
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 16
56% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 223
176% 243 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 57%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 15
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 7.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback