MSI Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7970
MotherboardMSI Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 17:21
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 524
66% 502 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 41.8
32% 37.5 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 36.6
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 50 89 64 77 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 483
Write 65.9
Mixed 125
SusWrite 78.8
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 23.3
112% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 26.3
62% 130 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
250GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 118 116 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 104
Write 76.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 117
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 120 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 118
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
728GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 78 78 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 37.5
Write 80.1
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 77.4
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 107%
Maxtor 3200 300GB
199GB free, PID 3210
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 17 0 6.6 0 2.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 35.2
Write 33
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 9.6
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.1
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 25%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB
327GB free, PID 6123
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 132 132 131 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 136
Write 112
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 131
150% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GC3000C15K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970) Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback