Asus UX303LNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus UX303LNB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX303LNB
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 11:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 177
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 249
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 250
15% 250 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Asus(1043 12DF) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 10.3
10% 10.9 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s Non-Secure 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2150000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 403 367 431 432 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 420
Mixed 236
SusWrite 394
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 34
142% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 131
149% 254 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6D1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX303LNB Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX303LNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback