Asrock H110 Pro BTC+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110 Pro BTC+  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 10:12
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$36
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 113
55% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 160
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 64.6
59% 68.6 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 67.9
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 29 66 70 75 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 87.9
Write 82.6
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 60.8
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 4GB 0112 78.B1GNL.4032B 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.4% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 21
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110 Pro BTC+ Builds (Compare 870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H110 Pro BTC+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback