Gigabyte GA-SBCAP3350-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-SBCAP3350-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 08:00
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350E
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
Memory 34.7
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 84.6
32% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 71.5
8-Core 60.2
9% 65.8 Pts
64-Core 78.1
5% 78.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 5A85) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 2.16
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SSBP128GTB3C0-S11 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 129 71 76 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 286
Write 250
Mixed 218
SusWrite 109
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 16
78% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 136
102% 138 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
A-DA 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 2.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback