MSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star H310 Gaming Infinite (MS-B915)
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 00:45
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 253
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 833
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 62.7
61% 70.2 fps
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 7.91
29% 37.7 fps
Poor: 51% Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 109 93 112 112 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 461
Write 254
Mixed 219
SusWrite 109
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 31.9
124% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 212
166% 232 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 89%
WD WD10EZEX-08RKKA0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 203 207 205 203 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 202
Write 153
Mixed 85
SusWrite 205
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28) Builds (Compare 1,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback