Chuwi LapBook Air

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemChuwi LapBook Air  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI LapBook Air
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 11:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 36.4
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 56.5
25% 40 Pts
4-Core 99.5
8-Core 102
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 99.3
6% 99.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.35 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 2.48
2% 1.99 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thinklife ST900 M.2 256G 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 275 284 309 296 304 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
Read 351
Write 299
Mixed 275
SusWrite 292
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 11.2
51% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 29
52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x4GB
2 of 3 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LapBook Air Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi LapBook Air

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback