Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 88.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 230 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 828 83% 676 Pts	64-Core 1,059 66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1596 MHz, MLim: 1765 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 132 Parallax 111 90% 118 fps	MRender 99.2 Gravity 104 Splatting 92.7 80% 98.7 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60 9,893 User benchmarks, average bench 274% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1446 1437 1445 1464 1408 491 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,100 Write 1,378 Mixed 1,325 SusWrite 1,282 288% 1,271 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 76.3 247% 89.8 MB/s	DQ Read 920 DQ Write 642 DQ Mixed 811 597% 791 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 390%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 206GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1340 405 406 404 405 405 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 1,530 Write 1,364 Mixed 1,170 SusWrite 561 259% 1,156 MB/s	4K Read 59 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 79.3 265% 92.8 MB/s	DQ Read 997 DQ Write 775 DQ Mixed 902 670% 892 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 388GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 471 471 477 477 478 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 484 Mixed 400 SusWrite 475 105% 464 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 60.5 202% 70.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 216GB free Firmware: 1A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 51 52 51 52 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 48 Write 49.2 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 51.8 33% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 41%
USB Flash Memory 8GB 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5 4.9 5 4.9 4.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 4.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.9 9% 8.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 7%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 2,465 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 96GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	22% Poor	Read 26.4 Write 24.5 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 63.3 54% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 42%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 8 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 12.5 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 10.6 19% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.1 91% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 36.9 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 22.5 60% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	559x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	528x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	216x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $97Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $117Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $888

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16