Asus A_F_K20CE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus A_F_K20CE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A_F_K20CE
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 14:19
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3060
BGA 1170, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 49.2
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 48.1
27% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 49.3
8-Core 46.9
6% 48.1 Pts
64-Core 48.2
3% 48.2 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 22B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 2.78
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3
2% 2.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 195 141 232 165 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 335
Write 290
Mixed 237
SusWrite 177
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 7.1
44% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 38
44% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_F_K20CE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A_F_K20CE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback