HP Pro 3505 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pro 3505 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3420 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 40
2-Core 70.5
37% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 73.4
8-Core 75.7
10% 74.6 Pts
64-Core 75.1
5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 36.6
31% 35 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 35.1
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 195 106 128 121 143 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 222
Write 223
Mixed 211
SusWrite 143
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 18.6
76% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 40.7
61% 115 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.4% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3505 Series Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3505 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback