TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 09:58
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 864
90% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,457
90% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 96.8%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 6B76)
CLim: 1750 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 98.6
Parallax 182
98% 134 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 138
Splatting 141
105% 125 fps
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 636 638 621 465 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 1,702
Mixed 819
SusWrite 602
287% 1,293 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 64.4
246% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 728
555% 748 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑
This bench: 228%
 Great: 254%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 131 128 136 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 136
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 130
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 74.5%
 Great: 112%
Generic MassStorageClass 197GB
183GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 45 45 42 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 92.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 44.9
69% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 4.4
243% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 31%
 Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.2
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 92.6%
 Great: 125%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,959x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples437x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples406x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples289x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples289x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $287Bench 90%, 645,160 samples251x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples286x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples228x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples215x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples281x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples232x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples225x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback