Asus P5E3 Deluxe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5E3 Deluxe  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100330
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 06:16
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 92.3
50% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 184
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
EVGA(3842 1187) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 6.59
3% 3.54 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 0.83
3% 4.55 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 211 201 153 343 338 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 502
Write 358
Mixed 307
SusWrite 227
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 29.7
105% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 167
144% 210 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 116 100 79 178 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 187
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 119
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.6
325% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5E3 Deluxe Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P5E3 Deluxe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback