Asus PRIME B250M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-K  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191022
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 11:14
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 255
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 701
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 109
95% 111 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 108
Splatting 77.5
84% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 175 104 55 135 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 440
Write 359
Mixed 154
SusWrite 135
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 29.5
132% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 166
138% 200 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
333GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 229 153 166 171 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 401
Write 377
Mixed 335
SusWrite 210
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 41.7
149% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 184
166% 252 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 95%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 197 48 54 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 832
Mixed 796
SusWrite 216
170% 768 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 78.8
277% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 225
284% 486 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 176%
Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
312GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 112
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 70%
Sony Hard Drive 1TB
638GB free, PID 05bf
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 108
Write 67.3
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 89.2
104% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B250M-K Builds (Compare 2,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-K - $73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback