HP 250 G4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 250 G4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80C1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151124
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 01:00
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 56
35% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 156
17% 135 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 80C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 3.22
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.91
4% 5.04 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-100 512GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X218
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 288 288 266 247 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 323
Write 305
Mixed 172
SusWrite 265
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 13.7
48% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 148
143% 225 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 90%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 37.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 33.4
44% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback