bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory18.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 15:30
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
None, 2 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 101
39% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 490
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 429GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 216 127 91 96 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 392
Write 402
Mixed 401
SusWrite 162
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 19
67% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 260
194% 259 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 56%
Virtual HD 64GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 399
Write 438
Mixed 396
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 20.9
66% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 198
160% 229 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
3968, 16512 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.7
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback