bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory18.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 15:30
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
None, 2 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 98.4
44% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 385
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 429GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 154 152 141 145 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 454
Write 174
Mixed 387
SusWrite 149
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 10.8
37% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 139
105% 142 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 56%
Virtual HD 64GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 67 77 87 70 70 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.8% Very poor
Read 166
Write 95.7
Mixed 110
SusWrite 77.1
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 6.5
23% 7.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 10.2
13% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
3968, 16512 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback